woman running Boston Marathon

Drenched with sweat, yet soaking up every glorious moment of the 2012 Boston Marathon. Should I ratchet up my training to feel that high again?

Last week, Dimity outlined her 2014 race calendar. While I don’t have my entire year mapped out, I have a few certainties in place, such as this Sunday’s Tinker Bell Half Marathon and next month’s Princess Half. I had contemplated an ultramarathon this year, but that was so 2013, when I was feeling old and slow.

Thanks to either a return to the track for speed workouts; a stronger (yet still flabby-looking!) core courtesy of twice/weekly barre-style classes; or perhaps divine intervention, I’ve rediscovered some speed I thought I’d lost back in 2010. While sub-1:50 half-marathons seem to have left the proverbial building for me, my 1:53 13.1 last month made me realize I am no longer knocking on the door of 2:00, either. That race result–plus the elevation profile of Canada’s Victoria Marathon (starts at 24 feet, drops as low as 9′ and “climbs” as “high” as 83′, before finishing at 20′), which I’m running this October–prompted Dimity to suggest I try to re-qualify for BostonGulp! (Leave it to an Ironmother to throw down that gauntlet.)

woman running Eugene Marathon

Near Mile 15 in my 2009 marathon PR race: I swear I was happier (and more comfortable) than my face shows.

While I’m a dreamer and a schemer, the Boston-qualifying idea hadn’t yet crossed my mind. But since Dim casually tossed it out there in a phone call, it’s been binging around in my brain. I’d have to run 3:55 or faster for 26.2, something I’ve done only once in 10 marathon attempts–and it took every last ounce of effort in me to do. (And a coach by my side, egging me on.) My last–and only other–under-4-hour marathon was in October 2010, and it was a squeaker of 3:59:54.

Suffice it to say: I’d have my work cut out for me to run 3:55 or better. Even the trusty McMillan Calculator suggests I’d have a lot of (speed)work to do to get there. Using Coach Greg McMillan’s math, my recent 1:53:12 half lands me at 3:58:14. for a marathon. A few BQ requisites: I’d need a coach to hold my Saucony-shod feet to the proverbial fire; I’d need to remain injury-free; I’d have to open myself up to some serious hurt in training; and I’d sometimes have to leave my trusty training partner, Molly, behind occasionally.

It’s that last detail–running minus Molly sometimes–that’s the biggest stumbling block for me. I love my Molly–and our laughter-filled runs–so much. We’ve been planning to head to Victoria, with our families in tow, since last fall. Truth be told, training side-by-side was the gorgeous race’s major draw for me. Trying to run fast enough to qualify for Boston would scrub that perk for at least a few workouts per week. Yet Molly responded with gusto when I floated Dimity’s SBS-BQ notion on our long run yesterday–she thinks I should reach for the stars while they are still (somewhat) within my grasp.

So now it’s up for me to decide: Do I get a coach and put myself out there, in the hopes of running a 3:55-or-better marathon–or do I train with Molly and aim for a 4:05-4:10 26.2? I’m all ears, ladies: What do you think I should do, mother runners? 

This Instagram photo from Sunday's run prompted Molly to suggest we do a series in which GU packet photo-bombs us. (Had to be there: Idea cracked us up!)

This Instagram photo from Sunday’s run prompted Molly to suggest we do a series in which GU packet photo-bombs us. (Had to be there: Idea cracked us up!)